ALADDIN
CENTER Carnegie Mellon UniversityCarnegie Mellon Computer Science DepartmentSchool of Computer Science
Abstracts
The Joint ALADDIN/Theory/Operations Research Seminar
Aladdin
About
Calendar
People
PROBEs
Workshops
Papers
Education
Related Activities
Corporate
Contact
 
Captcha
Outreach Roadshow

On the Integral Simplex Method for Set-Partitioning problems
Anureet Saxena, PhD student, GSIA
Oct 31, 2003, Posner 152, 3:30--5pm

Abstract:

This talk concerns set-partitioning problem P and associated linear program P'. Integral Simplex Method (ISM) was introduced by Gerald Thompson as a specialised form of simplex method in which only pivots on ones were allowed. In this talk we discuss a strict generalisation of ISM which allows pivots on $-1$ in addition to pivots-on-1. We prove that given any two basic feasible integer solutions $x^{1}$ and $x^{2}$ to a set-partitioning, $x^{2}$ can be obtained from $x^{1}$ by a sequence of $p$ pivots-on-1 (where $p$ of the number of indices $j\in N$ for which $x_{j}^{1}$ is nonbasic and $x_{j}^{2}=1$), such that each solution in the associated sequence is feasible and integer. As a by-product of our result, we show advantages of allowing pivots on $-1$. We devise a graph theoretical framework to systematically study pivoting schemes for the ISMs which allow pivots on 1 and -1, and propose two pivoting schemes for the same. The first pivoting scheme is an integral anti-cycling pivoting scheme and can be considered as a generalisation of lexicographic anti-cycling rule for conventional simplex method. The second scheme is based on {\em dynamic rule} based graph traversal and can be considered as a generalisation of {\em Bland's} rule. Computational results comparing the later pivoting scheme with other conventional schemes are presented.

 

This material is based upon work supported by National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0122581. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation